From Chalk to Silicon: A Practical Guide to Integrating AI in Medical Education

Main Article Content

Pedro Errázuriz G.

Keywords

artificial intelligence, medical education, digital health, clinical training

Abstract

Medical education is experiencing a profound transformation driven by the integration of artificial intelligence (AI). The current information overload demands a shift from information-based medicine to knowledge management, with AI playing a pivotal role. This article provides a practical guide to incorporating AI across different stages of medical education, from class prepara- tion and material generation to seminars, workshops, evaluations, and supervised clinical practice. AI has demonstrated utility in creating realistic clinical cases, virtual patients, and customized educational resources, as well as in automated grading and rubric design. Additionally, integrating AI literacy into health curricula is essential for developing professionals who understand both its applications and ethical implications. The DEFT-AI model is proposed as a framework for supervised student interaction. Rather than replacing educators, AI should be viewed as a powerful tool to optimize learning, foster critical thinking, and prepare future healthcare professionals for an evolving, technology-driven world.

Abstract 370 | PDF (Español (España)) Downloads 286

References

1. Wartman SA, Combs CD. Medical education must move from the information age to the age of artificial intelligence. Acad Med. 2018;93(8):1107-9. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/ACM.0000000000002044

2. Wartman SA, Combs CD. Reimagining Medical Education in the Age of AI. AMA J Ethics. 2019;21(2):E146-152. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1001/amajethics.2019.146

3. Errázuriz Gastellu P, Navech Bertea C, Nascimento Lenarduzzi T, Bustillos Torrez W, Zecchetto Moenne A. Percepción de la inteligencia

artificial en salud: estudio en profesionales y estudiantes. En: 56° Reunión ACP; 2025; Chile. Libro de Resúmenes ACP 2025. p. 53.

4. Yanagita Y, Yokokawa D, Fukuzawa F, Uchida S, Uehara T, Ikusaka M. Expert assessment of ChatGPT’s ability to generate illness scripts: an evaluative study. BMC Med Educ. 2024;24:536. doi: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-024-05534-8 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-024-05534-8

5. Klang E, Portugez S, Gross R, Kassif Lerner R, Brenner A, Gilboa M, et al. Advantages and pitfalls in utilizing artificial intelligence for crafting medical examinations: a medical education pilot study with GPT-4. BMC Med Educ. 2023;23:772. doi: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-023-04752-w DOI: https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-3146947/v1

6. Cheung BHH, Lau GKK, Wong GTC, Lee EYP, Kulkarni D, et al. ChatGPT versus human in generating medical graduate exam multiple choice questions-A multinational prospective study (Hong Kong S.A.R., Singapore, Ireland, and the United Kingdom). PLoS One. 2023;18(8):e0290691. doi: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0290691 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0290691

7. Yang YY, Shulruf B. An expert-led and artificial intelligence system- assisted tutoring course to improve the confidence of Chinese medical interns in suturing and ligature skills: a prospective pilot study. J Educ Eval Health Prof. 2019;16:7. doi: https://doi.org/10.3352/jeehp.2019.16.7 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3352/jeehp.2019.16.7

8. Cheng CT, Chen CC, Fu CY, Chaou CH, Wu YT, Hsu CP, et al. Artificial intelligence-based education assists medical students’ interpretation of hip fracture. Insights Imaging. 2020;11:119. doi: https://doi.org/10.1186/s13244-020-00932-0 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s13244-020-00932-0

9. Hallquist E, Gupta I, Montalbano M, et al. Applications of Artificial Intelligence in Medical Education: A Systematic Review. Cureus. 2025 Mar 1;17(3):e79878. doi: https://10.7759/cureus.79878 DOI: https://doi.org/10.7759/cureus.79878

10. Abdulnour RE, Gin B, Boscardin CK. Educational strategies for clinical supervision of artificial intelligence use. N Engl J Med. 2025 Aug 21;393(8):786-97. doi: https://10.1056/NEJMra2503232 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMra2503232